EY vs NCC Group: DORA Compliance Services Compared
Quick verdict: EY ranks higher overall (85/100 vs 70/100) on our methodology, largely on big 4 strengths. Choose NCC Group if its focus on banks or its premium pricing fits your situation better.
| Criteria | EY | NCC Group |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 out of 5 | 4.2 out of 5 |
| Overall score | 85/100 | 70/100 |
| Category | Big 4 | Cybersecurity specialist |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Manchester, United Kingdom |
| Founded | 1989 | 1999 |
| Pricing band | Enterprise | Premium |
| Gap assessment | Yes | No |
| DORA audit | Yes | No |
| Consulting | Yes | No |
| Resilience / pen testing | Yes | Yes |
| TPP register | Yes | No |
| Entity types served | 4 | 4 |
Where EY is strong
- Strong cyber and technology-risk practice aligned to DORA's ICT pillars
- Wide EU geographic footprint and supervisory experience
- Comprehensive service range across the DORA lifecycle
Where NCC Group is strong
- Specialist depth in penetration testing and threat-led resilience testing
- Established credentials (e.g. CREST) recognised for regulatory-grade testing
- Focused expertise directly mapped to DORA Articles 24-27
Which should you choose?
Choose EY if…
- You are a banks.
- You want enterprise-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise strong cyber and technology-risk practice aligned to dora's ict pillars.
Choose NCC Group if…
- You are a banks.
- You want premium-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise specialist depth in penetration testing and threat-led resilience testing.
Frequently asked questions
Is EY or NCC Group better for DORA compliance?
EY scores higher against our methodology (85/100 vs 70/100), but the right choice depends on your entity type, budget, and which pillars you need most.