Grant Thornton vs KPMG: DORA Compliance Services Compared
Quick verdict: KPMG ranks higher overall (84/100 vs 64/100) on our methodology, largely on big 4 strengths. Choose Grant Thornton if its focus on banks or its premium pricing fits your situation better.
| Criteria | Grant Thornton | KPMG |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 out of 5 | 4.4 out of 5 |
| Overall score | 64/100 | 84/100 |
| Category | Mid-tier | Big 4 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Amstelveen, Netherlands |
| Founded | 1924 | 1987 |
| Pricing band | Premium | Enterprise |
| Gap assessment | Yes | Yes |
| DORA audit | Yes | Yes |
| Consulting | No | Yes |
| Resilience / pen testing | No | No |
| TPP register | No | Yes |
| Entity types served | 4 | 4 |
Where Grant Thornton is strong
- Strong mid-market financial-services advisory footprint across the EU and UK
- Combined regulatory, audit, and cyber capability under one network
- Proportionate approach suited to mid-sized financial entities
Where KPMG is strong
- EU-headquartered with a deep regulatory advisory practice
- Broad entity coverage and mature governance frameworks
- Strong offering in regulatory reporting and register management
Which should you choose?
Choose Grant Thornton if…
- You are a banks.
- You want premium-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise strong mid-market financial-services advisory footprint across the eu and uk.
Choose KPMG if…
- You are a banks.
- You want enterprise-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise eu-headquartered with a deep regulatory advisory practice.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grant Thornton or KPMG better for DORA compliance?
KPMG scores higher against our methodology (84/100 vs 64/100), but the right choice depends on your entity type, budget, and which pillars you need most.