Grant Thornton vs NCC Group: DORA Compliance Services Compared
Quick verdict: NCC Group ranks higher overall (70/100 vs 64/100) on our methodology, largely on cybersecurity specialist strengths. Choose Grant Thornton if its focus on banks or its premium pricing fits your situation better.
| Criteria | Grant Thornton | NCC Group |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 out of 5 | 4.2 out of 5 |
| Overall score | 64/100 | 70/100 |
| Category | Mid-tier | Cybersecurity specialist |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Manchester, United Kingdom |
| Founded | 1924 | 1999 |
| Pricing band | Premium | Premium |
| Gap assessment | Yes | No |
| DORA audit | Yes | No |
| Consulting | No | No |
| Resilience / pen testing | No | Yes |
| TPP register | No | No |
| Entity types served | 4 | 4 |
Where Grant Thornton is strong
- Strong mid-market financial-services advisory footprint across the EU and UK
- Combined regulatory, audit, and cyber capability under one network
- Proportionate approach suited to mid-sized financial entities
Where NCC Group is strong
- Specialist depth in penetration testing and threat-led resilience testing
- Established credentials (e.g. CREST) recognised for regulatory-grade testing
- Focused expertise directly mapped to DORA Articles 24-27
Which should you choose?
Choose Grant Thornton if…
- You are a banks.
- You want premium-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise strong mid-market financial-services advisory footprint across the eu and uk.
Choose NCC Group if…
- You are a banks.
- You want premium-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise specialist depth in penetration testing and threat-led resilience testing.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grant Thornton or NCC Group better for DORA compliance?
NCC Group scores higher against our methodology (70/100 vs 64/100), but the right choice depends on your entity type, budget, and which pillars you need most.