Grant Thornton vs PwC: DORA Compliance Services Compared
Quick verdict: PwC ranks higher overall (86/100 vs 64/100) on our methodology, largely on big 4 strengths. Choose Grant Thornton if its focus on banks or its premium pricing fits your situation better.
| Criteria | Grant Thornton | PwC |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 out of 5 | 4.5 out of 5 |
| Overall score | 64/100 | 86/100 |
| Category | Mid-tier | Big 4 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, United Kingdom |
| Founded | 1924 | 1998 |
| Pricing band | Premium | Enterprise |
| Gap assessment | Yes | Yes |
| DORA audit | Yes | Yes |
| Consulting | No | Yes |
| Resilience / pen testing | No | Yes |
| TPP register | No | Yes |
| Entity types served | 4 | 4 |
Where Grant Thornton is strong
- Strong mid-market financial-services advisory footprint across the EU and UK
- Combined regulatory, audit, and cyber capability under one network
- Proportionate approach suited to mid-sized financial entities
Where PwC is strong
- Deep regulatory track record and direct engagement with EU supervisors
- Broad coverage across every regulated financial-entity type
- Full-lifecycle service breadth from gap assessment to audit and remediation
Which should you choose?
Choose Grant Thornton if…
- You are a banks.
- You want premium-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise strong mid-market financial-services advisory footprint across the eu and uk.
Choose PwC if…
- You are a banks.
- You want enterprise-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise deep regulatory track record and direct engagement with eu supervisors.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grant Thornton or PwC better for DORA compliance?
PwC scores higher against our methodology (86/100 vs 64/100), but the right choice depends on your entity type, budget, and which pillars you need most.