KPMG vs Forvis Mazars: DORA Compliance Services Compared
Quick verdict: KPMG ranks higher overall (84/100 vs 65/100) on our methodology, largely on big 4 strengths. Choose Forvis Mazars if its focus on banks or its premium pricing fits your situation better.
| Criteria | KPMG | Forvis Mazars |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 out of 5 | 3.9 out of 5 |
| Overall score | 84/100 | 65/100 |
| Category | Big 4 | Mid-tier |
| Headquarters | Amstelveen, Netherlands | Paris, France |
| Founded | 1987 | 1945 |
| Pricing band | Enterprise | Premium |
| Gap assessment | Yes | Yes |
| DORA audit | Yes | Yes |
| Consulting | Yes | No |
| Resilience / pen testing | No | No |
| TPP register | Yes | No |
| Entity types served | 4 | 4 |
Where KPMG is strong
- EU-headquartered with a deep regulatory advisory practice
- Broad entity coverage and mature governance frameworks
- Strong offering in regulatory reporting and register management
Where Forvis Mazars is strong
- Strong European, especially Continental, financial-services regulatory heritage
- Integrated prudential-regulation and ICT-risk advisory
- Well positioned for EU-headquartered financial entities
Which should you choose?
Choose KPMG if…
- You are a banks.
- You want enterprise-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise eu-headquartered with a deep regulatory advisory practice.
Choose Forvis Mazars if…
- You are a banks.
- You want premium-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise strong european, especially continental, financial-services regulatory heritage.
Frequently asked questions
Is KPMG or Forvis Mazars better for DORA compliance?
KPMG scores higher against our methodology (84/100 vs 65/100), but the right choice depends on your entity type, budget, and which pillars you need most.