KPMG vs PwC: DORA Compliance Services Compared
Quick verdict: PwC ranks higher overall (86/100 vs 84/100) on our methodology, largely on big 4 strengths. Choose KPMG if its focus on banks or its enterprise pricing fits your situation better.
| Criteria | KPMG | PwC |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 out of 5 | 4.5 out of 5 |
| Overall score | 84/100 | 86/100 |
| Category | Big 4 | Big 4 |
| Headquarters | Amstelveen, Netherlands | London, United Kingdom |
| Founded | 1987 | 1998 |
| Pricing band | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Gap assessment | Yes | Yes |
| DORA audit | Yes | Yes |
| Consulting | Yes | Yes |
| Resilience / pen testing | No | Yes |
| TPP register | Yes | Yes |
| Entity types served | 4 | 4 |
Where KPMG is strong
- EU-headquartered with a deep regulatory advisory practice
- Broad entity coverage and mature governance frameworks
- Strong offering in regulatory reporting and register management
Where PwC is strong
- Deep regulatory track record and direct engagement with EU supervisors
- Broad coverage across every regulated financial-entity type
- Full-lifecycle service breadth from gap assessment to audit and remediation
Which should you choose?
Choose KPMG if…
- You are a banks.
- You want enterprise-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise eu-headquartered with a deep regulatory advisory practice.
Choose PwC if…
- You are a banks.
- You want enterprise-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise deep regulatory track record and direct engagement with eu supervisors.
Frequently asked questions
Is KPMG or PwC better for DORA compliance?
PwC scores higher against our methodology (86/100 vs 84/100), but the right choice depends on your entity type, budget, and which pillars you need most.