Forvis Mazars vs PwC: DORA Compliance Services Compared
Quick verdict: PwC ranks higher overall (86/100 vs 65/100) on our methodology, largely on big 4 strengths. Choose Forvis Mazars if its focus on banks or its premium pricing fits your situation better.
| Criteria | Forvis Mazars | PwC |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 out of 5 | 4.5 out of 5 |
| Overall score | 65/100 | 86/100 |
| Category | Mid-tier | Big 4 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | London, United Kingdom |
| Founded | 1945 | 1998 |
| Pricing band | Premium | Enterprise |
| Gap assessment | Yes | Yes |
| DORA audit | Yes | Yes |
| Consulting | No | Yes |
| Resilience / pen testing | No | Yes |
| TPP register | No | Yes |
| Entity types served | 4 | 4 |
Where Forvis Mazars is strong
- Strong European, especially Continental, financial-services regulatory heritage
- Integrated prudential-regulation and ICT-risk advisory
- Well positioned for EU-headquartered financial entities
Where PwC is strong
- Deep regulatory track record and direct engagement with EU supervisors
- Broad coverage across every regulated financial-entity type
- Full-lifecycle service breadth from gap assessment to audit and remediation
Which should you choose?
Choose Forvis Mazars if…
- You are a banks.
- You want premium-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise strong european, especially continental, financial-services regulatory heritage.
Choose PwC if…
- You are a banks.
- You want enterprise-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise deep regulatory track record and direct engagement with eu supervisors.
Frequently asked questions
Is Forvis Mazars or PwC better for DORA compliance?
PwC scores higher against our methodology (86/100 vs 65/100), but the right choice depends on your entity type, budget, and which pillars you need most.