NCC Group vs PwC: DORA Compliance Services Compared
Quick verdict: PwC ranks higher overall (86/100 vs 70/100) on our methodology, largely on big 4 strengths. Choose NCC Group if its focus on banks or its premium pricing fits your situation better.
| Criteria | NCC Group | PwC |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 out of 5 | 4.5 out of 5 |
| Overall score | 70/100 | 86/100 |
| Category | Cybersecurity specialist | Big 4 |
| Headquarters | Manchester, United Kingdom | London, United Kingdom |
| Founded | 1999 | 1998 |
| Pricing band | Premium | Enterprise |
| Gap assessment | No | Yes |
| DORA audit | No | Yes |
| Consulting | No | Yes |
| Resilience / pen testing | Yes | Yes |
| TPP register | No | Yes |
| Entity types served | 4 | 4 |
Where NCC Group is strong
- Specialist depth in penetration testing and threat-led resilience testing
- Established credentials (e.g. CREST) recognised for regulatory-grade testing
- Focused expertise directly mapped to DORA Articles 24-27
Where PwC is strong
- Deep regulatory track record and direct engagement with EU supervisors
- Broad coverage across every regulated financial-entity type
- Full-lifecycle service breadth from gap assessment to audit and remediation
Which should you choose?
Choose NCC Group if…
- You are a banks.
- You want premium-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise specialist depth in penetration testing and threat-led resilience testing.
Choose PwC if…
- You are a banks.
- You want enterprise-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise deep regulatory track record and direct engagement with eu supervisors.
Frequently asked questions
Is NCC Group or PwC better for DORA compliance?
PwC scores higher against our methodology (86/100 vs 70/100), but the right choice depends on your entity type, budget, and which pillars you need most.