NCC Group vs Softstack: DORA Compliance Services Compared
Quick verdict: NCC Group ranks higher overall (70/100 vs 64/100) on our methodology, largely on cybersecurity specialist strengths. Choose Softstack if its focus on crypto-asset service providers or its mid pricing fits your situation better.
| Criteria | NCC Group | Softstack |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 out of 5 | 4.3 out of 5 |
| Overall score | 70/100 | 64/100 |
| Category | Cybersecurity specialist | Cybersecurity / crypto-native |
| Headquarters | Manchester, United Kingdom | Germany |
| Founded | 1999 | 2017 |
| Pricing band | Premium | Mid |
| Gap assessment | No | No |
| DORA audit | No | Yes |
| Consulting | No | Yes |
| Resilience / pen testing | Yes | Yes |
| TPP register | No | No |
| Entity types served | 4 | 7 |
Where NCC Group is strong
- Specialist depth in penetration testing and threat-led resilience testing
- Established credentials (e.g. CREST) recognised for regulatory-grade testing
- Focused expertise directly mapped to DORA Articles 24-27
Where Softstack is strong
- Deep ICT and crypto-native security-testing expertise relevant to DORA's resilience-testing pillar
- Strong, publicly documented client track record with a stated zero post-audit exploit history
- EU-based (Germany), aligning with DORA's supervisory context
Which should you choose?
Choose NCC Group if…
- You are a banks.
- You want premium-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise specialist depth in penetration testing and threat-led resilience testing.
Choose Softstack if…
- You are a crypto-asset service providers.
- You want mid-tier engagement economics.
- You prioritise deep ict and crypto-native security-testing expertise relevant to dora's resilience-testing pillar.
Frequently asked questions
Is NCC Group or Softstack better for DORA compliance?
NCC Group scores higher against our methodology (70/100 vs 64/100), but the right choice depends on your entity type, budget, and which pillars you need most.